Generally speaking, native mobile apps – which can be downloaded directly from the Play Store and installed on the phone – are more user-friendly than the Internet applications, with their general features. High sales data for native apps is also apparently a proof of this view. However, are these native, personalized applications to surpass web applications on all accounts? Let's see:
- Creation – As far as the development of mobile apps is concerned, native applications will win their hands. Since it is customized for different mobile platforms, full encoding is performed by application developers. Detect errors (if any) and release updates is easier, and track app appraisals. The time factor, however, is a cause for concern and will come later on.
- Speed – This circle applies to native mobile applications. When you buy an app from a Blackberry or iPhone application development company, it automatically becomes part of the built-in features of the handset. As such, booting on compatible devices takes just over a few seconds. Generally, web applications tend to be slower due to their rather strong Internet connectivity needs.
- Cost factor – For developer-specific applications, mobile application development costs for native applications are considerably higher than web-based. Applications that are compatible with multiple platforms may be particularly costly. The average time needed to create native prototypes of native applications is also higher. If you prefer native apps, you have to wait more!
- Usability – Best Android or iphone app developer experts suggest that both native applications and web applications may be user-friendly – though the former are at the forefront. This is because most native applications can be seamlessly integrated with the phone with a camera, sound / video camera and other handset features. Applications downloaded from mobile sites may not have this feature.
- App Store Approved – The main point where web applications override native mobile apps. Developers working on developing iphone applications may take up to a few weeks to create new apps and appear in online stores. Even if the app is able to gather enough users, it can not be guaranteed. interest. Web applications do not require such storage permissions and because it is easier to promote them.
- Security – Although the visibility of application stores can be quite time-consuming, the process can work alongside native applications. People can be assured that a mobile app that has been tested and approved by leading application stores is faultless and completely safe (both in terms of work and impact on the phone that it uses). For such web applications, such security is not available, although the well-known ones are easy to trust.
- Requirements for Internal Memory – Native applications require certain predetermined amount of memory space in the devices – for efficient operation. This is especially important because it is a selection of a mobile application development framework that does not have too much bandwidth of available smartphones. Because web applications do not need extra memory to boot and operate, their comfort is clearly higher than this number.
- Monitoring Application Performance – The application is more challenging than native applications compared to web-based applications. A mobile application development company specializing in native apps typically needs to develop multiple versions of each app, depending on the platform (iphone, BlackBerry, or Android) on which it will be used. Analyzes for each version should be tracked to get an idea of how the app performs. As far as web applications are concerned, there is a variation, so performance tracking is much easier.
- Finding Required Applications – Due to the range of available web applications, it may sometimes be somewhat complicated for users to find what they actually need on their phone. However, there are no such problems with native mobile apps, as Apple Play Store, Android Store and Blackberry App World regularly appear. Choosing and downloading native applications is generally less cumbersome than searching for the right web applications.
- Maintenance – Because native applications typically have custom encoding for different development platforms, maintenance is at least a bit more challenging than Web applications. The latter typically includes a multiplatform unified encoding, which facilitates the task of modification (if required). The cost of maintaining web applications is, of course, lower.
Sometimes it is difficult to keep a page using a version of a native app that makes it difficult to build upgrade plans. However, in terms of quality and performance, these native applications are mostly better than web applications. All in all, native applications offer a lot more user benefits – though web applications also have some positive points.